The Supreme Court is America's ultimate and fairest judgmental body and it's decisions are supposed to represent and protect all Americans. It is the final word in justice. Here's my question about that:
How does the Supreme Court's decision to overturn a law that limits corporate spending in candidate elections (that's been in place since Teddy Roosevelt) be representative of justice for American democracy? This recent decision which gives a corporation the same 1st amendment rights as every individual virtually places an election's outcome in the hands of the corporations. (Do you think any corporation has the American people's interest foremost in their business plan?) Now, with their vast financial resources, corporations can place any one they choose in office, period.
How does that protect the one person, one vote democratic idea that was put forth by the founding fathers. It doesn't!
I realize the the Supreme Court is, in reality, a political body and always has been but they're at least supposed to pretend to be in favor of a justice that serves the American people. With this most blatant decision, a 5-4 (Republican) vote in the court, even the pretension of equality for all is gone and there will NEVER be another fair election in America as a result.
Americans, get ready for corporate America to pick your politicians for you going forward. The Supreme Court just greatly diluted the value of your political choice known as a vote. Sit back, relax and wave goodbye to the power of your vote at the polls.
You can read about the decision here: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/22/us/politics/22scotus.html
Saturday, January 30, 2010
All the answers
I'm just going to dive right in with a comment and a couple of questions.
The Republicans now have all the right proposals, solutions and answers to health-care reform, the economic stimulation (or not,) the massive loss of jobs, two wars and all the other crises that they either created or allowed to be create by their wealthy constituents during George W. Bush's administration. Where in hell were all these political critics with all their answers during those 8 years of Republican rule? Why weren't they proposing and implementing these ideas if they're SO right for Americans?
Now that we have an administration that is actually trying to accomplish a few goals that benefit a large portion of the American people, the Republicans are "anti-all of it" because "they have better ideas."
The Republicans now have all the right proposals, solutions and answers to health-care reform, the economic stimulation (or not,) the massive loss of jobs, two wars and all the other crises that they either created or allowed to be create by their wealthy constituents during George W. Bush's administration. Where in hell were all these political critics with all their answers during those 8 years of Republican rule? Why weren't they proposing and implementing these ideas if they're SO right for Americans?
Now that we have an administration that is actually trying to accomplish a few goals that benefit a large portion of the American people, the Republicans are "anti-all of it" because "they have better ideas."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)